No, Brad Guzan Will Not Displace Shay Given
There's been many an article written today (the majority of them with a title that is some variation on "SHAY'S PLACE IN TEAM NO GIVEN" which is terrible) about the possibility of Brad Guzan's performances over the past month having been enough to earn him a permanent place in goal with Given being relegated to the bench. All of them focus pretty closely on this quotes from Alex McLeish:
(Given) is training with the group and it's a case of how sharp he's feeling and how confident he's feeling before we make a decision about him coming back into the team. There are no guarantees of that, obviously, because of the way Brad has played. Brad has been fantastic.
So there we have it. Alex McLeish himself, the man ostensibly in charge of making these decisions, has come right out and said Given has no guarantee of taking his place back from Guzan. Shouldn't that be enough proof?
Well, no. Not really.
Realistically, McLeish almost has to say that. Guzan has been fantastic in Given's absence, and not pointing that out would be a slap in the face to Little Brad, who's had to deal with a few of those over the course of his Villa career. But the reality is that as good as Guzan was over the course of these past eight games, Given has been as good or better over the course of a career that began 17 years ago. He was excellent before going down to injury in early December, so much so that Kirsten felt the need to apologize for her skepticism of his signing.
Will the quality of Guzan's performances make it easier for Villa to ensure Given is back to full health before his return rather than rushing him along? Without question. But Villa just spent £3.5m (which is suddenly a fairly large chunk of change for the club) on Given and signed him to a 5 year contract this summer. It would be one thing if he'd been a disappointment early in the season, but he wasn't at all; he was as advertised, if not better.
I understand having sympathy for Guzan; he's waited so long to get his chance, and he blew even the most optimistic of expectations out of the water. He's shown that he's capable of being a starting keeper in the Premier League. After all that, it's got to be tough to accept a reserve role. But it's not any more unfair than pushing Given to the bench after suffering an injury, especially seeing as how he signed with Villa in large part because of the promise of being the number one keeper as long as he held up his end of the bargain.
There's just no controversy here. As long as he's healthy, Shay Given is Villa's starting keeper.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
dont agree
so we should play hutton still because he was bought is what ur telling me?
no offense, but i just think your wrong, one thing i Trust AM with is goal keepers… if he keeps Guzan than so be it. i think he can do it.
How the balls does that comparison make sense?
Given’s been great here…
Cricket blogger and writer of nonsense at 7500 to Holte
by MattF15 on Jan 11, 2012 9:28 PM GMT via iPhone app up reply actions
Hutton is shit yes but.....
the implication in the article is that Given cost 3.5 mil and as such is entitled to his place on that strength…..nobody is doubting his pedigree least of all me….I live in Ireland.The simple truth is if you are the better keeper you deserve the place,Guzan is currently our No1 and its up to Given to get his place back….he has no divine right to the shirt.
by Happy Villan on Jan 12, 2012 7:44 PM GMT up reply actions
That isn't at all the implication.
The implication is that if a team pays £3.5 million for a player, they aren’t going to take away his place based on a month’s worth of good performances by his backup while he’s out injured.
If Given had been bad it would be a different story, but he was good. Guzan was no better.
by Aaron Campeau on Jan 12, 2012 8:19 PM GMT up reply actions
Shay Given's groin will always be wonky
So perhaps McLeish could rotate at the goalkeeper spot a bit? Maybe play Guzan every third game. I know Given won’t like it, but he ought to make a slight concession to his age and recent injury history.
I am just a bitter Wizards fan who clings to my bobbleheads and that 2005 playoff series victory!
by George Templeton on Jan 12, 2012 6:44 AM GMT reply actions
not relevant
Guzan has done the job is a younger keeper…a good pro and deserves to be left in situ….


















